Skip to content

The Eclectic Light Company

Macs & painting – 🦉 No AI content
Main navigation
  • Downloads
  • Freeware
  • All Macs
  • M1-M5 Macs
  • Troubleshooting
  • Painting
  • Mac Front Page
hoakley May 1, 2026 Macs, Technology

Use Finder tags for categories

Finder tags are a simple and accessible way of categorising files and folders by attaching one or more of seven colours to them, together with a text label. This article explains how they work, and how to get the best from them.

Tag metadata

Finder tags are stored in extended attributes of type com.apple.metadata:_kMDItemUserTags. They consist of a binary property list containing a little UTF-8 text. This is an array of strings, each containing a tag name, followed by the newline character, followed by the colour number (0-7). The array can be empty, which usually indicates a tag had been attached, but has now been removed.

tags04

Colour numbers used are:

  • none, 0
  • grey, 1
  • green, 2
  • purple, 3
  • blue, 4
  • yellow, 5
  • red, 6
  • orange, 7.

Thus a tag name might read Red\n6, or Orange\n7 Green\n2 for two colours, where \n represents the newline character 0a. As the user can assign (almost) arbitrary text to labels, those could equally be Urgent\n6, or Important\n7 Project\n2. When in a location indexed by Spotlight, the text content prior to the newline character (excluding the digit) in each tag is indexed.

When the Finder writes a tag extended attribute to an item, it also adds a null com.apple.FinderInfo xattr of 32 bytes length, if that isn’t already present.

Tagging

Tags are easily added to a file or folder in the Finder by selecting the item and using the command in the contextual menu. The menu lists the seven favourite tags, as selected in the Finder’s settings, by colour.

A separate command opens a floating window offering all tags instead, giving access to others in addition to the seven favourites.

Tags are removed from items using the same tools, either to remove one of the seven favourite tags, or any other that has been attached.

Once attached to a file or folder, the colours of its tags are displayed in the Name section of each type of Finder window. List view can be set to display the text label as well, although that’s not available in other window types. In macOS Tahoe, tagged folders are also coloured according to the last of the tags attached to them, when that option is enabled in the Finder’s settings.

Tags are widely supported in the Finder, macOS tools, and apps. When you show Tags in the Finder’s sidebar, you can view items with only a specific tag by selecting that tag in the sidebar. The same feature works in file Open and Save dialogs in all apps using the standard macOS dialog too. You can further refine tag-based listings by opting to sort those files in date or other orders, and you can group by tags as well.

Editing and management

Tags and their text labels are managed in the Finder’s settings, in the Tags tool.

This allows you to add and remove tags from the main list, to edit the label of each (either in the same way you rename files in the Finder, or using the contextual menu), to delete a tag, and to set which tags appear in the list of seven favourites at the foot. If you customise one of the standard tags by changing its name, say from Red to Urgent, then the Finder automatically changes all items marked with that tag to show that new label.

Similarly, deleting an existing tag from this list removes it and its label from all files and folders tagged with them, throughout that Mac’s storage. This behaviour can sometimes catch users unaware of those extensive consequences.

Each tag and label remains associated with that file or folder: when you copy it across to another Mac, the tag remains attached, and on that second system should continue to show the same colour and label. This also applies to any custom tags you add. The important exception to this is if the item is moved using a method that doesn’t preserve its extended attributes, which occurs on some file systems such as NFS, and when using some command line tools. Some backup methods may also not preserve extended attributes, and will strip all your tags; Time Machine preserves them all.

Categories and labels

There are only seven different tag colours, and although many different labels can be associated with each colour, in practice Finder tags work best when tags and labels are matched one-to-one. Note that you can’t associate two different coloured tags with the same label.

Tagging is simplest when each colour only has a single label associated with it, as colours and labels are then fully interchangeable. Labels can also work well when used to qualify categories, for example using red tags for those tasks due this week, with text specifying the day. Broadening the range of labels for a given tag can quickly lead to confusion: imagine the consequences of using a red tag with emails that are labelled Important, and those marked as Junk.

For example, if you want to classify your photos into no more than seven categories, such as social, travel, parties, and so on, they should work well with tags. If you want to add the names of people in each image, or their locations, then tags are likely to be the wrong type of metadata for that. Another example is tagging projects: if you need no more than seven different project tags, then Finder tags should serve well. If you need a dozen or more, then they’ll quickly prove inadequate.

Labels aren’t intended to contain longer text, as they’re not displayed in a way that would make that easy to read. If you want to attach structured or free text to files and folders, use other extended attributes including Keywords, Comment (not Finder comment, though), Description, Subject and Information. Although these are also indexed by Spotlight and can be searched for, there is still no option to display them in Finder windows.

Spotlight search

Finder tags can also be used as a criterion in Spotlight searches, although those are based not on the tag colour but its label, such as Important for a red tag labelled Important. You’ll need to add the Tags item to the Finder’s list of search criteria before you can use it to find items in the Finder’s Find window.

Happy tagging!

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Macs, Technology and tagged extended attributes, Finder, metadata, tags, xattr. Bookmark the permalink.

28Comments

Add yours
  1. 1
    Andrew Swift's avatar
    Andrew Swift on May 1, 2026 at 7:25 am
    Reply

    I love labels! Since I often have files and photos to rate, I use:

    • purple: Selected
    • red: ★★★★★
    • orange: ★★★★
    • yellow: ★★★
    • green: ★★
    • blue: ★
    • gray: Done

    LikeLiked by 2 people

    • 2
      hoakley's avatar
      hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:18 pm
      Reply

      Thanks. There is also a metadata item named in Spotlight as Rating that can do the same thing, although it behaves differently.
      Howard.

      LikeLike

      • 3
        Andrew Swift's avatar
        Andrew Swift on May 1, 2026 at 4:29 pm
        Reply

        I did not know that (Mac user since 1987). Has it always been possible or is it recent, and how are they accessed?

        LikeLiked by 1 person

        • 4
          hoakley's avatar
          hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 6:06 pm

          They’ve been around for at least ten years, but AFAIK don’t go back to Classic Mac OS. I will be writing more about these metadata next week.
          Howard.

          LikeLike

  2. 5
    John's avatar
    John on May 1, 2026 at 8:44 am
    Reply

    In my experience, Tags are one feature of the modern OS Finder that have worked reliably and trouble-free.

    Cannot say the same for window management, which often has a mind of its own, and in particular, some applications like Sequoia’s Mail.app, where it is simply atrocious. And in general has been since Panther, my entry point to OS X.

    As a Classic OS user who became accustomed to, and was able to rely on the Finder and OS to respect all the window sizes and positions in my workflow, it can be exceedingly frustrating at times.

    I’ll take rebuilding the Desktop a thousand times over the .DS files that the OS likes to ignore seemingly at will.

    LikeLiked by 1 person

  3. 6
    John Gilbert's avatar
    John Gilbert on May 1, 2026 at 11:10 am
    Reply

    Why the emphasis on colours? I have hundreds of tags and no colour in any of them.

    Limit of seven useful tags! Sorry to say it, but that is nonsense!

    Ironic Software https://ironicsoftware.com introduced OpenMeta tags to OS X (10.6?) with the Leap app https://ironicsoftware.com/leap/. This tagging was later taken up by Apple in Mavericks as “Finder Tags”. From memory, it was at that time that the colours were added – but using them is completely optional and does not in any way restrict much wider use of tags.

    There are apps to assist in tag management. The most basic being the command line app tag https://github.com/jdberry/tag/ which I use to automate tagging of files. At the top is the use that DEVONthink makes of tags.

    LikeLiked by 1 person

    • 7
      hoakley's avatar
      hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:41 pm
      Reply

      You are of course welcome to use or abuse them as you like. What I have described doesn’t require any additional apps or tricks to use them, and will work on any Mac.
      I note that the tag command tool you’re recommending is very old, and has some open issues in recent macOS. I did consider suggesting it, and decided it was best not to because of those.
      Howard.

      LikeLike

    • 8
      hoakley's avatar
      hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:46 pm
      Reply

      Oh – and one question about your tag system. How do you view your text-only tags in any Finder window that isn’t in List view?
      Howard.

      LikeLike

      • 9
        John Gilbert's avatar
        John Gilbert on May 2, 2026 at 3:31 am
        Reply

        As well as List view, Finder shows tags in the preview pane on the right in column view and in Get Info. When I am working on files and tags in Finder I use the Option-Command-I Get Info.

        Anyone who is making heavy use of tags should consider getting Leap https://ironicsoftware.com/leap/, but whether it is really worth US$58 I doubt. I have a license from long ago.

        But the productive use of tags is searching, not looking or editing. For that Spotlight (Command-space), Finder and HoudahSpot work very nicely. As does DEVONthink – but I stopped using that a few years ago.

          LikeLiked by 1 person

          • 10
            hoakley's avatar
            hoakley on May 2, 2026 at 9:28 am

            “the productive use of tags is searching”
            That can be applied to any xattr containing text, such as Keywords and Contents. Why choose Finder tags which are only half-based on text labels, and half on coloured tags (as the name might suggest)?
            Howard.

            LikeLike

    • 11
      Chuck's avatar
      Chuck on May 1, 2026 at 12:13 pm
      Reply

      Tags (or their predecessors, icon colours) have been around for a very long time, Classic System 7 IIRC, and I consider them old friends.

      In principle, I like the idea of giving meaning (in addition to their colour) to them but find their ‘shared global scope’ a problem in practice. Once a colour, e.g. ‘red’, has several meanings the primitive UI for organising and applying them becomes fiddly.

      I’ve recently discovered, however, that you can add a ‘Tags’ optional column to Finder’s display (ctl+mouse-down on an existing column heading), which helps me greatly.

      I do wish that a ‘tool tip’ label giving the meaning of the coloured dot would appear when hovering the mouse over the dot(s) in a file-list. For, some reason, this doesn’t happen at least on my machine. I should fire up the ‘Feedback.app’ and suggest this, I suppose….

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 12
        hoakley's avatar
        hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:22 pm
        Reply

        Thank you – yes, as I write above that can be useful, but only applied to List views.
        Howard.

        LikeLike

    • 13
      Duncan's avatar
      Duncan on May 1, 2026 at 1:24 pm
      Reply

      I don’t understand why we can’t change or add different colo[u]rs to tags. With Mail rules, you can use the color picker to assign any color you’d like, such as different shades of blue depending on the sorting rule’s meaning. (Unfortunately, color-blind people miss out on a lot of this.) But with the Finder we get the most limited Crayola assortment available (not even brown!), which severely limits their visual utility.

      I’m a bit surprised and dismayed that after more than a decade this hasn’t been improved upon.

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 14
        hoakley's avatar
        hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:31 pm
        Reply

        The current implementation of Finder tags relies on human colour perception, and human factors research. Because each colour is a distinct group that has to be recognised on its own (rather than in comparison with other colours), there’s a limited number of colours that humans with normal colour perception can recognise clearly, and that’s about seven. Increase that number, and no matter which colours you choose, errors increase.

        Some languages like Russian do have two different names for shades of blue in their basic colour lexicon, but outside of Russia at least most humans can only clearly identify one blue when it appears as a small dot as these tags do.

        When you then consider the challenges posed of the 1 in 20 of males who don’t have such good colour perception, even seven seems a little over-generous.

        It’s Mail that has got it wrong, and I suspect was designed by someone with no understanding of human factors, an increasing phenomenon in Apple in recent years. Unless humans have undergone a remarkable evolution in that brief period.
        Howard.

        LikeLike

        • 15
          Duncan's avatar
          Duncan on May 2, 2026 at 4:08 am
          Reply

          I mentioned color-blind and color-impaired people in my comment, and I agree with your summary. But for those of us with better color perception, having the option of selecting our own colors would be a boon.

          Everyone would get the basic seven colors by default. But a simple setting to enable user-selected colors would open up a lot more visual options. Those who choose to stay with the basics won’t be affected.

          (As for Mail’s user-selected colors, I use them to great effect. I have set up a few dozen sorting filters (rules), many of which place messages from key vendors or accounts into separate folders. To color-code those messages I use the dropper tool from the color picker and select the most prominent color from the vendor’s logo and assign that to the text of the subject line. For example, my T-Mobile bills and notices are all colored magenta. Amazon reciept emails get the orange from the graphic in their logo. Messages from Omni Group (I use Omnifocus) get the purple from that app’s logo.

          There isn’t a perfect alignment between all such mail rules and the colors I assign, but at a first pass it helps when sorting through subject lines when performing an all-mailbox search.

          Given the differences between all those specific colors, being constrained to Apple’s tag’s seven-color maximum would be a big step down.)

          LikeLiked by 1 person

          • 16
            hoakley's avatar
            hoakley on May 2, 2026 at 9:37 am

            I’m afraid you’ve missed the point of colours, Duncan. They’re not used to compare one tag with another, but to recognise a category.

            While humans with normal colour perception can distinguish between colours with great precision, the colours we can recognise categorically are considerably more limited, especially when displayed in small blobs on a display. As I wrote, testing with real humans has demonstrated that categorisation errors increase as the number of colours increases. When there are more than 7 different colours, people miscategorise the colours. Those selected for Finder tags aren’t random, or based on aesthetics, but on human testing. There’s an extensive literature on this (I used to be familiar with it), and it’s used to determine colours in many other circumstances, such as those used for electrical wiring.

            In the past, Apple designed the Mac interface on sound human factors research such as this, which is intended to spare users from causing themselves interface problems, and that has always been one of its great strengths, although it’s steadily waning now, cf Liquid Glass, etc.
            Howard.

            LikeLike

          • 17
            Duncan's avatar
            Duncan on May 2, 2026 at 3:37 pm

            “As I wrote, testing with real humans has demonstrated that categorisation errors increase as the number of colours increases. When there are more than 7 different colours, people miscategorise the colours.”

            Even if we agree that seven colors (well, ~seven of just about anything in top-level categorization) is a reasonable limit for many or most humans, there’s a different reason to allow user customization of tag colors.

            Colorblindness comes in varying degrees and can affect visual detection to different colors. Red-green colorblindness, for example, results in the two looking practically indistinguishable, so providing the usual ROYGBV assortment for tags essentially merges two colors into one, visually. Not only does that deprive the user of the full seven-color utility, it actually confuses the use of the red and green tag labels, rendering them worse than to simply remove one of the two. And this similarly applies to other variants of colorblindness.

            A remedy would be to allow a color-blind person to choose their own tag colors, picking the best contrast combination for their visual perception (not Apple’s forced selection). Again, make that a separate setting that one has to intentionally enable (leaving the seven-color assortment as the default), and now color tags could be used more effectively by more people. How is that a bad thing?

            LikeLiked by 1 person

          • 18
            hoakley's avatar
            hoakley on May 3, 2026 at 1:03 pm

            Thank you, Duncan. That’s quite a different suggestion.

            The only way for those to be compatible with current Finder tags would be to provide for colour customisation in Accessibility settings, to change those seven colours globally.

            You can experiment with this using a similar set of colours and Sim Daltonism, a superb free app that simulates the major forms of impaired colour perception.

            Sadly, I don’t think it would work. In some conditions with impaired sensation, there’s compensation in another sensory modality, such as blind folk who are able to glean more information about their surroundings from what they hear. That isn’t accomplished at a sensor level, but in acquired processing skills.

            Far from those with impaired colour perception being able to compensate by increasing their ability to sense other colours, most find a wider range of colour being confusing, causing difficulty in colour categorisation. So by squeezing more tag colours into a restricted range of colour perception, it’s more likely to increase their error rate, just as it would in anyone with more normal perception.

            There’s a simple example you can use: although very rare (thankfully), true monochromatic vision. If you gave a monochromat a choice of seven custom shades of grey, they would have exactly the same categorisation problem as anyone else, and a very high error rate as a result. I suspect they’d quickly revert to using only two or three greys, not all seven.

            So while I like your optimism, I think this would only make matters worse for those with more limited colour perception, which would be a bad thing.

            Your point about existing colour labels is flawed, though. If you do use Finder tags, one of the first things you do is customise their labels. Tagging files with the label Red isn’t purposeful, unless perhaps you’re an interior designer. There is though a little interesting psychological diversion to be had by mislabelling colours, e.g changing the label for the yellow tag to read Red instead. There are some fascinating results you could obtain from recognition tests with contradictory sensory inputs like that!
            Howard.

            LikeLike

    • 19
      elmimmo's avatar
      elmimmo on May 1, 2026 at 2:10 pm
      Reply

      If you want to attach structured or free text to files and folders, use other extended attributes including Keywords, Comment (not Finder comment, though)

      What is a Comment extended attribute that is not a Finder comment and how does one add it to a file?

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 20
        hoakley's avatar
        hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:33 pm
        Reply

        I will expand on that and other extended attributes next week. In Spotlight, Finder Comments are called Spotlight Comments, while regular Comments are simply Comments. There are other metadata where Spotlight knows two different properties with the same name, just to confuse even further!
        Howard.

        LikeLike

    • 21
      xz4gb8's avatar
      xz4gb8 on May 1, 2026 at 2:49 pm
      Reply

      I have used Finder Tags for categories since long before “AI” became a fad. I had discovered that text labels sorted well in Finder, while the addition of a color tag with the text aided visual selection of a category, compensating for degraded visual acuity. The recent addition of folder colors is interesting although often overridden by an Icon? file within. Your explanation shows that Finder, with all complaints we have heard, can be quite useful in collating indexing information.

      Apple seems to have found a new interest in categories but does not seem to really understand that “AI” is not required. See also Mail Categories, where Apple-definitions may not fit user needs and is better disabled. Dedicated folders appearing in the Mail Favorites Bar allow both manual and automated message categorization with no LLM needed.

      LikeLiked by 1 person

    • 22
      David B's avatar
      David B on May 1, 2026 at 3:29 pm
      Reply

      Each tag and label remains associated with that file or folder: when you copy it across to another Mac, the tag remains attached, and on that second system should continue to show the same colour and label.

      Does this mean that you can search for the tag (name) associated with the color Red using 2 different names if you’ve copied from one system to another.
      System 1: Red : Important
      System 2: Red : DontTouch
      Copy from 1 -> 2 and wouldn’t the Red tag on the file change to DontTouch or is there some other mechanism to track that Red has 2 different tags?

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 23
        hoakley's avatar
        hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 3:37 pm
        Reply

        No.
        When you move the file from System 1 to System 2, the xattr moves with it, so on System 2 it shows exactly the same colour number, and exactly the same label, as on System 1. The only time macOS will change labels is when you rename a tag in the Finder’s Settings, e.g. from Red to Important. It then changes all whose labels were Red to read Important.
        Howard.

        LikeLike

    • 24
      Malcolm Hall's avatar
      Malcolm Hall on May 1, 2026 at 5:49 pm
      Reply

      I would love to see an example of how someone is using tags and spotlight (e.g. saved searches) to organise files instead of using folders. It probably requires some different kind of file naming scheme since there is no longer a hierarchy of folders and it isn’t possible to make a hierarchy of tags.

      In the Notes app you can right click a folder and convert it to a smart folder which puts the note into the flat all notes folder and inserts a tag at the end using the folder name. It’s interesting to me there is no such option when right clicking a folder in the Finder to do the same.

      It is probably pointless investing any time in tags since they aren’t indexed by Synology’s implementation of server search for Samba. So it would be very fragile to organise your files with tags when they might get lost or be unusable, e.g. on a network drive or possible even an external drive.

      LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 25
        hoakley's avatar
        hoakley on May 1, 2026 at 6:11 pm
        Reply

        I think that would be doomed to failure on any significant scale. Flat filing systems like that rapidly become unmanageable. You wouldn’t want any more than around 100 items in each category. As ~/Documents folders can readily have 100,000 files in them, that would require at least 1,000 categories, which would presumably have to have some sort of numeric system like a Dewey-Decimal book classification.
        To live with more than a few hundred files, you have to rely on a hierarchical file system structure into directories.
        Howard.

        LikeLike

      • 26
        John Gilbert's avatar
        John Gilbert on May 2, 2026 at 3:54 am
        Reply

        It is possible to organise tags to create a multi-dimensional view of documents. My experience is that it requires some rigour in creating the tags using a defined sets of tags.

        I get multi-dimensions by using a non alphabetic as the 1st character. As an example, I use = as the first character of the tags indicating the source of the document – e.g. =web, =evernote, =perplexity, =book, = note, etc. And if the first character is digit, then this will be date. You can add further dimensions appropriate to your document usage.

        And if the first character is alphabetic, it is just a label attached to the file.

        If I was running a business I would create dimensions for invoices, clients, etc.

        But is this really worth the effort? I have come to mostly use it for tags I can automate using Hazel to tag new files.

        LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 27
        Duncan's avatar
        Duncan on May 2, 2026 at 4:23 am
        Reply

        “I would love to see an example of how someone is using tags and spotlight (e.g. saved searches) to organise files instead of using folders.”

        Gmail sort of does this, which reflects Google’s main business as a search company. If you use their web interface (I use them strictly through IMAP access), everything is dumped into a single Inbox which you can sift and sort through using their search tools. How well this works for storing thousands of email messages is an exercise left to the reader.

        (My personal mail archive goes back to the 80s and has over 100,000 messages stored up. I aspired to save every single email message I ever sent or received (minus spam), and went through decades on mail lists. All of this is sorted into over a hundred separate folders, and I can call up any specific message if I know my own organization or can perform an intelligent search locally. For me, email is the best diary I’ve ever had, even if it wasn’t intended to serve that purpose originally.)

        LikeLiked by 1 person

      • 28
        fceruti's avatar
        fceruti on May 6, 2026 at 8:25 pm
        Reply

        I have two great experiences:
        1. I downloaded a much of sounds, thousands and thousands across many libraries. I used tags to make a selection.
        2. More of an on going basis, I have a tag called: “Series Pointer”, where I give the tag to the next episode I’m at for all the series I have on my computer.

        Bonus: “Personal”, anything that helps me fill out burocratic stuff. Passport picture, Car insurance / papers, Bank details, Birth certificate, etc.

        LikeLiked by 1 person

    Leave a comment Cancel reply

    Quick Links

    • Free Software Menu
    • System Updates
    • Mac Troubleshooting Summary
    • M-series Macs
    • Painting

    Search

    Monthly archives

    • May 2026 (19)
    • April 2026 (73)
    • March 2026 (82)
    • February 2026 (71)
    • January 2026 (72)
    • December 2025 (75)
    • November 2025 (74)
    • October 2025 (75)
    • September 2025 (78)
    • August 2025 (76)
    • July 2025 (77)
    • June 2025 (74)
    • May 2025 (76)
    • April 2025 (73)
    • March 2025 (78)
    • February 2025 (67)
    • January 2025 (75)
    • December 2024 (74)
    • November 2024 (73)
    • October 2024 (78)
    • September 2024 (77)
    • August 2024 (75)
    • July 2024 (77)
    • June 2024 (71)
    • May 2024 (79)
    • April 2024 (75)
    • March 2024 (81)
    • February 2024 (72)
    • January 2024 (78)
    • December 2023 (79)
    • November 2023 (74)
    • October 2023 (77)
    • September 2023 (77)
    • August 2023 (72)
    • July 2023 (79)
    • June 2023 (73)
    • May 2023 (79)
    • April 2023 (73)
    • March 2023 (76)
    • February 2023 (68)
    • January 2023 (74)
    • December 2022 (74)
    • November 2022 (72)
    • October 2022 (76)
    • September 2022 (72)
    • August 2022 (75)
    • July 2022 (76)
    • June 2022 (73)
    • May 2022 (76)
    • April 2022 (71)
    • March 2022 (77)
    • February 2022 (68)
    • January 2022 (77)
    • December 2021 (75)
    • November 2021 (72)
    • October 2021 (75)
    • September 2021 (76)
    • August 2021 (75)
    • July 2021 (75)
    • June 2021 (71)
    • May 2021 (80)
    • April 2021 (79)
    • March 2021 (77)
    • February 2021 (75)
    • January 2021 (75)
    • December 2020 (77)
    • November 2020 (84)
    • October 2020 (81)
    • September 2020 (79)
    • August 2020 (103)
    • July 2020 (81)
    • June 2020 (78)
    • May 2020 (78)
    • April 2020 (81)
    • March 2020 (86)
    • February 2020 (77)
    • January 2020 (86)
    • December 2019 (82)
    • November 2019 (74)
    • October 2019 (89)
    • September 2019 (80)
    • August 2019 (91)
    • July 2019 (95)
    • June 2019 (88)
    • May 2019 (91)
    • April 2019 (79)
    • March 2019 (78)
    • February 2019 (71)
    • January 2019 (69)
    • December 2018 (79)
    • November 2018 (71)
    • October 2018 (78)
    • September 2018 (76)
    • August 2018 (78)
    • July 2018 (76)
    • June 2018 (77)
    • May 2018 (71)
    • April 2018 (67)
    • March 2018 (73)
    • February 2018 (67)
    • January 2018 (83)
    • December 2017 (94)
    • November 2017 (73)
    • October 2017 (86)
    • September 2017 (92)
    • August 2017 (69)
    • July 2017 (81)
    • June 2017 (76)
    • May 2017 (90)
    • April 2017 (76)
    • March 2017 (79)
    • February 2017 (65)
    • January 2017 (76)
    • December 2016 (75)
    • November 2016 (68)
    • October 2016 (76)
    • September 2016 (78)
    • August 2016 (70)
    • July 2016 (74)
    • June 2016 (66)
    • May 2016 (71)
    • April 2016 (67)
    • March 2016 (71)
    • February 2016 (68)
    • January 2016 (90)
    • December 2015 (96)
    • November 2015 (103)
    • October 2015 (119)
    • September 2015 (115)
    • August 2015 (117)
    • July 2015 (117)
    • June 2015 (105)
    • May 2015 (111)
    • April 2015 (119)
    • March 2015 (69)
    • February 2015 (54)
    • January 2015 (39)

    Tags

    APFS Apple Apple silicon backup Big Sur Blake Bonnard bug Catalina Consolation Console Corinth Delacroix Disk Utility Doré El Capitan extended attributes Finder firmware Gatekeeper Gérôme High Sierra history history of painting iCloud Impressionism landscape LockRattler log M1 Mac Mac history macOS macOS 10.12 macOS 10.13 macOS 10.14 macOS 10.15 macOS 11 macOS 12 macOS 13 macOS 14 macOS 15 malware Metamorphoses Mojave Monet Monterey Moreau myth narrative OS X Ovid painting performance Pissarro Poussin privacy Renoir riddle Rubens security Sierra SilentKnight Sonoma SSD Swift Time Machine Tintoretto Turner update upgrade Ventura xattr Xcode XProtect

    Statistics

    • 22,254,220 hits
    Blog at WordPress.com.
    Footer navigation
    • About & Contact
    • Free Software Menu
    • Macs
    • Painting
    • Downloads
    • SilentKnight, Skint, SystHist, silnite, LockRattler & Scrub
    • XProCheck, T2M2, LogUI, Ulbow, blowhole and log utilities
    • Mints: a multifunction utility
    • xattred, SpotTest, Providable, Spotcord, Metamer & xattr tools
    • Versatility & Revisionist
    • DelightEd & Podofyllin
    • Precize, Alifix, UTIutility, Sparsity, alisma, Taccy, Signet
    • System Updates
    • Spundle, Cormorant, Stibium, DropSum, Dintch, Fintch and cintch
    • Virtualisation on Apple silicon
    • Cirrus & Bailiff
    • Text Utilities: Textovert, Disclipper, Nalaprop, Dystextia and others
    • sysctl information
    • Extended attributes (xattrs)
    • 32-bitCheck & ArchiChect
    • Keychains & Permissions
    • PDF
    • VisualLookUpTest
    • Updates
    • Long Reads
    • Mac Troubleshooting Summary
    • Saturday Mac Riddles
    • Last Week on My Mac
    • Painting topics
    • Mac problem-solving
    • M-series Macs
    Secondary navigation
    • Search

    Post navigation

    On Reflection: The Venus Effect
    Naturalists: Photography

    Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    • Comment
    • Reblog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • The Eclectic Light Company
      • Join 9,158 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • The Eclectic Light Company
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Copy shortlink
      • Report this content
      • View post in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar

    Loading Comments...

      %d